<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Earth: Impact Structures Continued</title>
	<link>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/</link>
	<description>I think there used to be a tagline about (tag)soup here... anyway...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Nono</title>
		<link>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Nono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>I made a Blog with various categories (short stories, poems, animals, ...) and Google Earth. As I noticed than visitors are very interested by this category I send  to them a link to your Blog. (See : http://jean.sudarovich.free.fr/index.php/2005/10/29/blog-sur-google-earth/)
Thank you for the quality of your informations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a Blog with various categories (short stories, poems, animals, &#8230;) and Google Earth. As I noticed than visitors are very interested by this category I send  to them a link to your Blog. (See : <a href="http://jean.sudarovich.free.fr/index.php/2005/10/29/blog-sur-google-earth/" rel="nofollow">http://jean.sudarovich.free.fr/index.php/2005/10/29/blog-sur-google-earth/</a>)<br />
Thank you for the quality of your informations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspar</title>
		<link>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank,

That's something I noticed as well. It's a left-over from the &lt;a href="http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/CINameSort.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Earth Impact Database&lt;/a&gt; table, in which ages are presented this way. For older craters it doesn't matter because most are measured in millions of years. But for sub-million years, you'll get these weird 0.0000xx dates. I've been meaning to fix this, either by hand or automatically. I haven't decided yet.

As for 'mio'... It's something, but what I meant was 'Million'. That's fixed now. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something I noticed as well. It&#8217;s a left-over from the <a href="http://www.unb.ca/passc/ImpactDatabase/CINameSort.html" rel="nofollow">Earth Impact Database</a> table, in which ages are presented this way. For older craters it doesn&#8217;t matter because most are measured in millions of years. But for sub-million years, you&#8217;ll get these weird 0.0000xx dates. I&#8217;ve been meaning to fix this, either by hand or automatically. I haven&#8217;t decided yet.</p>
<p>As for &#8216;mio&#8217;&#8230; It&#8217;s something, but what I meant was &#8216;Million&#8217;. That&#8217;s fixed now. <img src='http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thinklemon.com/weblog/2005/10/24/google-earth-impact-structures-continued/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I'm wondering if you should use different notation for your ages in the most recent collection.   I'm thinking some non-scientific types might be a bit thrown off by "Age: 0.049 ± 0.003 Mio years".

And, what exactly is a "mio"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if you should use different notation for your ages in the most recent collection.   I&#8217;m thinking some non-scientific types might be a bit thrown off by &#8220;Age: 0.049 ± 0.003 Mio years&#8221;.</p>
<p>And, what exactly is a &#8220;mio&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
