Google Earth: Suspected Earth Impact Sites March 2006 update (KML)

Comments

15 responses to “Google Earth: Suspected Earth Impact Sites March 2006 update (KML)”

1. 

   March 20, 2006

   squawky

   Excellent — thanks so much for this :)…was looking for a way to plot a crater on a Google Earth map, and the IFSG sent me here.

   Wanted to give you an update on one crater — the crater Quillagua should be located at -21.50 latitude, not 21.50 (which, I believe, is a typo in the original database).
2. 

   April 16, 2006

   WyldFyr

   I have a candidate for a crater that isn’t in the database. How do I add my contribution? is there a link somewhere?
3. 

   April 18, 2006

   Caspar

   @squawky: duly noted. Quillagua will be updated on the next run.

   @WyldFyr: I’m sorry, but currently there is no easy way to submit craters. Though I’ve been meaning to build one.
   I’m not the person to include suspected impact craters in the SEIS database. To be included you’ll probably need to have some sort of scientific proof to validate its origin. Not every ’round’ feature on earth is an impact crater, but could also be an extinct volcano, dried-up riverbent, cave-in, …
   But there are other avenues of attack.

   1. One could write about their discovery on their own website. Like for instance http://www.astroseti.org/impacts.php

   2. One could post a placemark on sites like Google Earth Hacks (http://www.googleearthhacks.com/addfile.php) or Tagzania (http://www.tagzania.com/tag/crater) describing their find. Whatever suits you best.

   3. You could post the coordinates (latitude/longitude) right here so I, and everyone else, could take a look (I’m no expert on geologic features, but I could blog about it).

   I suggest you do the 3rd option. 🙂
4. 

   July 14, 2006

   Alejo Hausner

   The coordinates for Watterson lake are wrong. See my posting on the site above.
5. 

   July 15, 2006

   Caspar

   Alejo, you may be right. The latitude of Watterson Lake in Seis is 65.22, while Bull’s eye lake has a latitude of 61.22. (Longitude is almost the same) So this could be an error in the database.
6. 

   August 14, 2006

   Dave Dunn

   Like WyldFyr I have a candidate for a crater, the coordinates are 3 37 S 24 30 E, maybe you could blog about this.
7. 

   August 14, 2006

   Caspar

   Hi Dave,

   I can’t tell if its truly an impact crater. But it looks promising, although I cannot find info on it in the SEIS database or on Google. Here’s what I could make of it in Google Earth (KMZ download). I’ll pass it on to the SEIS database owner.
8. 

   August 15, 2006

   David Rajmon

   Ladies and Gentlemen,
   thanks for the corrections and proposals for SEIS. The structure in Congo looks intriguing indeed. I will include it in the next database release. Please do not hesitate to let me know about your findings. I may find your proposals improbable or reject them right away but that’s usefull as well. And from time to time, some structures may be interesting enough look at them closer. The best way to submit a structure is in SEIS format in a spreadsheet. More detailed instructions are the SEIS database.

   Cheers,
   David
9. 

   January 10, 2008

   Lab Lemming

   You are missing chuxulub, shoemaker crater, and box hole crater in NT, to name just a few.
10. 

    January 10, 2008

    Caspar

    Well not exactly. Those mentioned are confirmed impact craters. The SEIS database contains suspected ones only.

    Take a look at http://www.thinklemon.com/pages/ge for the SEIS as well as the confirmed impacts.
11. 

    January 22, 2008

    Mick Wilson

    have you considered “out-sourcing” some of the data qa/qc stuff? I could help set up a transaction feature service hosting the impact database into which users could lodge proposed corrections. You (or whoever) then vets, accepts or rejects the proposal. Spread the maintenance load, increase the number of eyeballs applied to the task. PS many of the SEIS proposals in the Indian Ocean belong in Argentina – a missing negative sign in longitude, I believe.

    Good job! Cheers
12. 

    January 23, 2008

    Caspar

    Hello Mick,

    Back in 2006 I did think about an open webinterface to the database, built a demo and discussed it very briefly with David Rajmon. But sometimes plans just stay what they are, plans.

    If you’re serious about the ‘out-sourcing’ thing, please contact mister Rajmon. As he is the owner the database and probably willing to participate. He may also be reached through the IFSG.
13. 

    January 29, 2009

    des

    I noticed a possible impact crater in western china, a very large one, I’ve been looking for any reference to this impact. The crater is the whole sand area around 39 lat, 82 lon. From my (limited) calculations this would have penetrated the crust and maybe reemerged approximately 30 35″lat, 65 lon. Has anyone seen any data on such an event.
    If my calculation are correct this would explain the large amount of sand across the top of Africa and the rise of the Himalayas.
    Any info would be much appreciated.
14. 

    October 3, 2011

    Larry Gault

    I was at Quillagua, Chile last week and learned about the “Valley of 108 Craters”. I will be back in a few months with my metal detector and will be taking GPS recordings for you. I have a power paragliding cart and will be doing searches for meteorites in the near future. Give me an email address and I will forward some interesting photos of the area: driest desert in the world.
15. 

    February 25, 2013

    Mike Flaugher

    I’d like to find a way to filter by dates. I’m on the hunt for impacts that happened ca 245 MYA at the Ordovician/Silurian transition (I live near Jeptha Knob). There appears to have been a string of impacts across N Europe into E Canada and down into the US. Considering this was at 245 MYA we were probably all near the equator. Could the big hit have been Ilyinets and the others cause by a break-up?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.